Why we don’t think in terms of assets, but in terms of position

6 février 2024

Real estate is still too often approached as a catalog of properties: size, price, number of rooms. This way of reading the market is now insufficient.

The Property Is Visible, the Position Is Not

Two properties may appear comparable on paper:

  • same size
  • same price
  • same apparent location

Yet their true value can be radically different.

Value does not lie solely in the property, but in its position:

  • orientation
  • view
  • immediate surroundings
  • accessibility
  • potential for development

A Logic Borrowed from Finance

In financial markets, assets are not considered in isolation, but as positions. A position implies context, strategy, and time horizon.

Applied to real estate: a property becomes a position as soon as it is integrated into a broader analysis.

What This Perspective Changes

Moving from a “property” to a “position” allows for a better understanding of real liquidity, anticipation of resale, evaluation of scarcity, and more informed decisions between opportunities.

It is a dynamic, not static, way of thinking.

A Concrete Example

On the French Riviera:

  • a seafront apartment with an unobstructed view
  • an apartment a few streets away without a view

Same size, same city, but two completely different positions. Two completely different valuations.

A More Demanding Approach

Thinking in terms of position requires:

  • rejecting certain properties
  • applying stricter filtering
  • prioritizing quality over quantity

It is a less commercial approach, but a more accurate one for understanding the market and standing out in the execution of our operations.

Conclusion

Real estate is not limited to what we see. It must be understood through its ability to fit into a coherent whole, at a given moment and for a specific objective.

Back

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.